ISO 27002 vs SOC 2: Which Security Framework is Right for Your Business?

ISO 27002 vs SOC 2: Which Security Framework is Right for Your Business?

(PUBLISHED)

9.12.2025

(WRITER)

Lomax Team

ISO 27002 vs SOC 2: Which Security Framework is Right for Your Business?

Introduction: Why Information Security Standards Matter More Than Ever

In today's digital landscape, data breaches and cyber attacks have become a constant threat to businesses of all sizes. With nearly 48% of organizations experiencing more cyber attacks than the previous year, implementing robust security frameworks isn't just a best practice—it's a business imperative.

Whether you're a SaaS provider handling customer data or an enterprise managing sensitive information, choosing the right security framework can mean the difference between building trust with clients and facing devastating security incidents. Two frameworks stand out as industry leaders: ISO 27002 and SOC 2.

But which one is right for your business? Let's dive deep into both frameworks to help you make an informed decision.

What is ISO/IEC 27002?

Overview and History

ISO/IEC 27002 is an international standard for information security controls, published jointly by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). Originally developed from a British standard in the mid-1990s, it has evolved significantly, with its most recent major update released in February 2022.

Key Characteristics

ISO 27002 provides best practice recommendations for establishing, implementing, and improving an Information Security Management System (ISMS). Here's what makes it unique:

Important distinction: ISO 27002 itself is not certifiable. However, it serves as the implementation guide for ISO 27001, which is certifiable. Think of it this way:

  • ISO 27001: Specifies ISMS requirements (certifiable)
  • ISO 27002: Provides detailed guidance on how to implement those requirements

The 2022 Structure: 93 Controls in Four Themes

The latest version organizes security controls into four main categories:

1. Organizational Controls (37 controls)

These address policies, compliance, business processes, and relationships with third parties. Examples include:

  • Information security policies
  • Asset management
  • Supplier relationships
  • Business continuity management
  • Compliance with legal requirements

2. People Controls (8 controls)

Focused on human resource security, including:

  • Background screening
  • Terms and conditions of employment
  • Information security awareness and training
  • Remote working policies
  • Disciplinary process

3. Physical Controls (14 controls)

Concerning physical security measures such as:

  • Physical security perimeters
  • Secure areas
  • Equipment security
  • Clear desk and clear screen policies
  • Equipment maintenance

4. Technological Controls (34 controls)

The largest category, covering:

  • Access control
  • Cryptography
  • Network security
  • Backup procedures
  • Malware protection
  • Security logging and monitoring
  • Vulnerability management

Benefits of ISO 27002

1. Comprehensive Framework: Covers the CIA Triad—Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability—with 93 detailed controls based on internationally recognized best practices.

2. Flexibility: Not all controls are mandatory. Organizations can select relevant controls based on their specific risk assessment and business needs.

3. Global Recognition: As an international standard, ISO 27002 is recognized worldwide, facilitating international business relationships and partnerships.

4. Interoperability: Can be mapped to other security frameworks like NIST, SOC 2, CIS, and TISAX, making it easier to achieve multiple compliance requirements.

5. Industry Agnostic: Applicable to organizations of any size or industry.

What is SOC 2?

Overview and Background

SOC 2 (System and Organization Controls 2) is a voluntary compliance framework developed by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) in 2010. It's specifically designed for service organizations—particularly cloud providers, SaaS vendors, and technology companies—that store and process customer data.

Core Purpose

SOC 2 was created to establish trust between service providers and their customers by providing a standardized way to evaluate and report on security controls. Unlike ISO 27002, SOC 2 results in an actual audit report that can be shared with customers, partners, and stakeholders.

Trust Services Criteria (TSC)

SOC 2 is built around five Trust Services Criteria:

1. Security (Mandatory)

  • Protection against unauthorized access
  • Network security
  • Access controls
  • Authentication mechanisms
  • Required for all SOC 2 audits

2. Availability

  • System and service uptime
  • Monitoring and incident response
  • Disaster recovery
  • Business continuity

3. Processing Integrity

  • System processing is complete, valid, accurate, and timely
  • Data quality and error handling
  • Authorized processing

4. Confidentiality

  • Protection of sensitive information designated as confidential
  • Encryption requirements
  • Data handling procedures

5. Privacy

  • Collection, use, retention, and disposal of personal information
  • Alignment with AICPA's Privacy Management Framework
  • Compliance with privacy regulations

Important: Organizations choose which criteria apply to their business (except Security, which is always required).

SOC 2 Report Types

Type I Report:

  • Evaluates controls at a specific point in time
  • Answers: "Are the security controls designed properly?"
  • Typically faster and less expensive
  • Good for organizations just starting their compliance journey

Type II Report:

  • Evaluates how controls operate over a period of time (typically 3-12 months)
  • Answers: "Do the security controls work effectively over time?"
  • More comprehensive and valued by customers
  • Demonstrates ongoing commitment to security

Audit Outcomes

After a SOC 2 audit, organizations receive one of four opinions:

  1. Unqualified Opinion: Passed—controls meet all requirements
  2. Qualified Opinion: Mostly passed, but some areas need attention
  3. Adverse Opinion: Failed—significant control deficiencies
  4. Disclaimer of Opinion: Insufficient information to make a determination

The Auditing Process

Only AICPA-licensed CPAs or CPA firms can conduct SOC 2 audits. The process includes:

  • Review of security policies and procedures
  • Testing of control effectiveness
  • Employee interviews
  • Evidence collection
  • Final report preparation

ISO 27002 vs SOC 2: Side-by-Side Comparison

FeatureISO 27002SOC 2ScopeUniversal information security controlsService organization customer data securityCertificationNot certifiable (supports ISO 27001)Compliance report issuedStructure93 predefined controls in 4 themes5 Trust Services Criteria with flexible controlsFlexibilitySelect applicable controls based on riskOrganizations design their own controlsAudit/AssessmentISO certification bodies (for 27001)AICPA-licensed CPAs onlyGeographic FocusInternationalPrimarily US, but globally recognizedIndustry FocusAll industriesService organizations, SaaS, cloud providersReport SharingCertificate (for 27001)Detailed audit report shared with stakeholdersTime FramePoint-in-time or ongoing (27001)Type I (point) or Type II (3-12 months)CostGenerally higher (especially for certification)Varies widely by organization sizeUpdate FrequencyPeriodic (2022 latest)Continuous AICPA updates

Which Framework is Right for Your Business?

Choose ISO 27002 (and pursue ISO 27001 certification) if:

You operate globally and need international recognition✅ You're in a regulated industry (finance, healthcare, government)✅ You have European customers or partners who specifically request it✅ You want a comprehensive, prescriptive framework with detailed controls✅ You need to demonstrate compliance with multiple frameworks simultaneously✅ Your organization is mature with established security practices✅ You're not solely a service/technology provider

Best for: Large enterprises, international organizations, regulated industries, companies with diverse operations

Choose SOC 2 if:

You're a SaaS company, cloud provider, or technology service providerYour primary market is the United StatesYou need to provide audit reports to customers during vendor assessments✅ You want flexibility to design controls specific to your business✅ You're a startup or scale-up needing faster compliance✅ Your customers specifically request SOC 2 reportsYou handle sensitive customer data in the cloud

Best for: SaaS companies, cloud service providers, managed service providers, technology startups, B2B software companies

Can You Pursue Both?

Absolutely! Many organizations, especially those serving global markets, pursue both frameworks. The good news is that there's significant overlap:

  • Both focus on protecting confidentiality, integrity, and availability
  • Many controls map between the frameworks
  • Work done for one can support compliance with the other
  • Tools and processes can often satisfy both requirements

Implementation Considerations

For ISO 27002/27001:

Timeline: 6-18 months for initial certificationCosts: $50,000-$300,000+ depending on organization sizeOngoing: Annual surveillance audits, three-year recertificationResources: Dedicated ISMS team, documentation, training

For SOC 2:

Timeline: 3-12 months (Type I faster than Type II)Costs: $20,000-$100,000+ depending on scopeOngoing: Annual audits, continuous monitoringResources: Security team, evidence collection, CPA firm engagement

Making Your Decision: Key Questions to Ask

  1. Who are your primary customers? (Geographic location and industry)
  2. What do your customers specifically request? (RFPs, security questionnaires)
  3. What is your business model? (Service provider vs. product company)
  4. What are your growth plans? (Regional expansion, market targets)
  5. What's your current security maturity level? (Existing controls and processes)
  6. What's your budget and timeline? (Resources available for compliance)
  7. Do you have regulatory requirements? (Industry-specific mandates)

Conclusion: Trust, Compliance, and Business Growth

Whether you choose ISO 27002, SOC 2, or both, implementing a recognized security framework demonstrates your commitment to protecting customer data and managing information security risks. In an era where data breaches can cost millions and destroy customer trust, these investments are essential for business sustainability and growth.

Remember:

  • ISO 27002/27001 offers global recognition and comprehensive security management
  • SOC 2 provides customer-focused assurance for service organizations
  • Both frameworks strengthen your security posture and competitive position
  • The right choice depends on your specific business context and goals

The most important step is to start somewhere. Begin with a gap assessment, understand your current security posture, and chart a path forward. Whether you choose the international comprehensiveness of ISO or the service-provider focus of SOC 2, you're making a critical investment in your organization's future.

Need help deciding which framework is right for your organization? Consider conducting a preliminary gap assessment with a qualified consultant to understand your current state and compliance readiness.